为您找到与奥运会刘国梁采访相关的共8个结果:
乔治·索罗斯(George Soros),1930年8月12日生于匈牙利布达佩斯,犹太人。本名是捷尔吉·施瓦茨(Gyoumlrgy Schwartz),匈牙利出生的美国籍犹太裔商人,著名的慈善家,货币投机家,股票投资者和政治行动主义分子。下面读文网分享了索罗斯达沃斯接受彭博采访全文,供你阅读。
George Soros: Well, it's one of the -- basically, the key issue is deflation. Now, you don't -- it's a condition that we are not used to. None of us have lived in a deflationary environment. The last time we had that is in the 1930s. And the -- while I was around, I was not yet engaged in the markets.
So we just don't know how to handle it. It's a different environment. But now, we have to fix it.
LACQUA: On China, do you expect, actually, a -- a hard landing?
George Soros: Well, it's -- it has happened. We -- I'm merely -- I'm not expecting it, I'm just observing it. But China can manage it. It's got -- it's got resources. It has a greater latitude in using policies than most other countries because it has over $3 trillion of reserves and so on.
However, they have a way of inflicting their problem, passing it on to the rest of the world.
So they can -- they can handle it, even if they don't get the position right. They can certainly continue for two or three years on the wrong course.
But the effect on the rest of the world -- and that is actually mainly deflation. It's a source -- it's one of the sources of deflation. You've got basically three major root causes. One is China. The other one is oil and raw material prices. And the third is competitive devaluation or beggar thy neighbor policies. And you have all three.
LACQUA: How difficult is it for central banks to fight deflation? We're at zero band, almost. Is there any ammunition left?
George Soros: Well, it's -- it's difficult because whether you have minus 20 basis points or minus 30 basis points is not going to stimulate the economy. Quantitative easing has worked. It has saved the world from the deflation, the great depression. That's the lesson we have learned from the 1930s. It's Ben Bernanke who learned it. He knew it. And when he realized that he underestimated the magnitude of the problem, he used his knowledge and he engaged in a two-pronged, which is when you lose control of the -- of a car, right, you have to turn the wheel in the direction in which the skid is taking you. And when you have regained control, then you correct direction.
So the first step was to flood the money -- the market with money. And it's a long-term maneuver. The Fed was being (INAUDIBLE) was the first one to reach the point where it wanted to correct the second curve and reached it last year and started talking about it.
But they didn't act.
And by the time they act -- that they acted, the window of opportunity closed. So they acted at the wrong time. One year too late, by raising interest rates when the European economy is already -- not the European, the U.S. economy is already slowing down.
And that's because of deflation, because -- and that was the -- it really became apparent in December when you had the benefit of lower oil prices, which is -- which gave you effectively a tax cut, but the households, instead of spending the extra money, saved it to -- used it to improve their own finances because they felt they could buy the same goods cheaper next year.
LACQUA: If you're saying that the Fed hike in December is a mistake, so the Fed, at that moment, is telling us four rate hikes this year. The market believes two rate hikes.
Do you think that actually Janet Yellin will have to revert -- reverse and cut rates?
George Soros: Yes, well...
LACQUA: This year?
George Soros: -- it is -- I -- I would be very surprised if you had another increase in the rates. There were supposed to be four. And effectively, they were aiming at getting up to 3 percent. That would have been back to normal. It would have given them more ammunition to then -- to ease when the -- you have downward pressure.
But they can't get there.
LACQUA: But do you think she'll have to cut? And if she does cut, does...
George Soros: Who does?
LACQUA: Janet Yellin. If the Fed has to cut rates, to reverse that rate hike which you think is a mistake, what does it do to her credibility...
George Soros: No. Well, a mistake has happened and if you have to correct it, it's the right thing and not to stick to it.
But so it could happen that they cut it. But that won't be much of a stimulus. In other words, the quantitative easing works, but it has a diminishing return.
LACQUA: But how did quantitative easing actually work if deflation has to do with oil prices? I mean it's quite difficult in this environment, even if you look at Mario Draghi, he's been trying to get inflation up and it hasn't quite worked. Do we have to look through the oil price to -- to look at the pressures of deflation?
George Soros: Yes. Well, you can't look through it, because it's right there. So Draghi is going to expand the -- because he now has, apparently, that's what he said today, he has the support of the Bundesbank. And he has the evidence of the slowdown. So he will do it.
LACQUA: How would you play the markets in this kind of environment? What do you buy?
George Soros: Yes. Well, I -- I'm no longer, you know, in the markets, so I don't know the details. I'm -- I've become the -- the Eisi (ph) Berlin's hedgehog, you know, one big idea. The one big idea is deflation.
And therefore, since I don't know the market, I shorted SNPs, I shorted the raw material producing countries and Asian countries' currencies against the dollar and I went long, government -- U.S. government bonds.
LACQUA: This was at the end of last year?
George Soros: This was at...
LACQUA: And do you approved (INAUDIBLE)?
George Soros: Yes.
LACQUA: For this year? When -- when does deflation start being a concern? What will kick start inflation?
George Soros: Well, no, you -- I think this year is going to be a difficult year and the balance is at the -- is on the down side. So I think -- I don't -- you may hit a bottom, you know, I mean it's been declining rather rapidly. And, actually, it hit some kind of a bottom yesterday, because there was a give-up, there was a beginning of a panic. And it took -- it turned around. But it wasn't a classic bottom, because it didn't have the big shift. And it still ended down. Today, there is a follow-through. So you could have a bounce.
But I don't think this is a good entry point here, because you already have, let's say, normally you recover one third to two thirds of the -- of the loss. Well, you have almost recovered one third already.
So it's -- and if you have a real bottom, it's always retested. So this -- this is not a time to buy, in my opinion, but rather to -- for those who have to sell, sell.
LACQUA: Wait, because we will probably see another correction. Do you worry about the U.K. leaving the EU?
George Soros: Well, I don't know too much about -- I notice the currency made a new low. That's probably good for stimulating (INAUDIBLE). I don't know enough about that. As I said, I'm a hedgehog.
LACQUA: Talking about new lows, we also had the ruble touching a new low.
George Soros: Pardon?
LACQUA: We also had the ruble touching a new low.
George Soros: Yes. You -- yes.
LACQUA: A record low.
George Soros: Yes.
LACQUA: What's your take on Russia?
George Soros: Well...
LACQUA: How much do we understand about what President Putin wants to do next?
George Soros: Well, I think it's very clear that Russia is in a very, very weak position. It can, again, it has enough reserves that it can last a couple of years.
There's a big year for it in 2017, when a lot of debt comes due.
So I would say that's -- they have to do something now. And, in fact, they are doing something, because they're -- their balance -- budget will drop to 6 percent and they have to cut it to 3 percent. So they want a -- an overall reduction between 5 percent and 10 percent in their -- in their budget.
And that actually violates the social compact that has made him so popular, which is basically financial stability and a steadily slowly but steadily rising standard of living.
And that, you know, is violating. And he has to do something about it.
So he, you know, he's acting from a very weak position. And that's why -- that's what makes him adventurous. That's what -- that's why he takes big risks, because he knows he needs to do something. And that's why he went into Syria, as well, hoping that it would improve his conditions.
So actually, you now have a race against time. There's a -- the impeding collapse of the Russian economy and the actually occurring collapse of the European Union. And it's a question which -- who collapses more and sooner.
And unfortunately, the EU is winning that race. And that's why I am so thrilled by (INAUDIBLE) turning around and I'm really an enthusiastic supporter, because that's what you need to do something when you are in -- you are in danger.
And it it's a U-turn for him, because he's, you know, opposed to adding to the debt. But when should you use the debt, except when you are in -- you are in danger, right?
So I am all for it.
LACQUA: What is the solution for -- on the refugee crisis in Europe?
George Soros: Well, it's, basically, you have to set a high enough target for refugees to be accepted. Let's say a million a year. And you have to make it clear that you will keep that open until those who qualify are actually accepted.
And then, you can demand that they should stay where they are and wait their turn. And that way, they won't rush, as they do now, to get here while the door is still open.
And that will reduce the flow to manageable proportions, where because now, we have past a tipping point where the influx reduces the ability -- capacity of the receiving countries to assimilate or to integrate the refugees.
So you have a panic. With -- without a common European asylum policy, there is a panic. It's like a cinema on fire without exit signs.
And that effects every -- the population, the general population, the refugees and the authorities that are in charge of maintaining law and order.
So there's a genuine panic.
And then it's everybody out for himself. I can't blame Victor Urban (ph) for trying to protect Hungary's borders under those conditions. I can blame him for refusing to participate in a common asylum policy. That is the problem. And he's not the only one.
You have now got a lot of countries opposed. But this is what you need.
And then, you then have to have a comprehensive policy that reaches beyond the borders of the European Union and you look after the refugees where they're currently situated.
And that is about to happen. We are on the -- we are doing it. There's going to be a summit on February 4th in London, co-chaired by Cameron and (INAUDIBLE)...
LACQUA: (INAUDIBLE).
George Soros: -- Maco (ph). And this will be directed at Jordan, which is a small country, 6.8 million people, with 25 percent of the population is Syrian refugees.
So there's a tremendous number. And now, the -- there are new refugees coming from Syria because the Russians are bombing the civilian population in the south of Syria and pushing them into Jordan.
So unless you did something to make the plan is now to open the common market to special economic zones, where people can -- multinationals and local and Syrian entrepreneurs can set up businesses and they have free access to a European market.
And their -- that will give employment both to the refugees and to the local population. And that should help to stabilize the situation and make it possible for them even to accommodate the newly coming refugees.
So that's a step in the right direction. And the same negotiations argon with Turkey. Turkey has now passed a law which allows 10 percent of companies to be Syrian refugees. So that will provide employment for them.
And you also have to improve the education of the children. And then they will not come, so the flow will be brought under control.
LACQUA: (INAUDIBLE).
George Soros: And that...
LACQUA: Mr. Soros, are you -- are you worried so about the political future of Angela Merkel?
Will she have to backtrack on the promises she's made to refugees because of the backlash at home?
George Soros: Yes, unfortunately, she uncharacteristically risked her political capital on this issue. She realized that the migration could tear Europe apart. She was -- unfortunately, she was right. And she wanted to stop it.
So she risked her political capital and she lost, because the -- her gesture of opening up Germany was not properly prepared. You see, you should have created this asylum policy, etc.
But actually, by doing it, she has made it possible to speak about accepting a million refugees because effectively, Germany is accepting them.
So in a way, by making that imaginative response, she made it now possible to have an asylum policy.
That's the sine quo non.
LACQUA: Will we find more of a solution in the Middle East in the next 12 months?
And -- and, again, what role does Russia have to play in this?
George Soros: Well, unfor -- as I say, the situation is not good because Putin, since he's in a race with the European Union, he wants the European Union to collapse and therefore he's generating -- he's using the refugee crisis as a -- a way of disintegrating Europe.
So the bombing is going on. So there is a -- there is a negotiations. But the bombing is still. And the Americans are trying to find out whether he's serious when he's talking about a political settlement or whether he's just playing with us.
And unfortunately, I'm afraid the latter is the case. So because of that, you can't expect a solution at the root, namely Syria.
LACQUA: Given all this, the market turmoil, China, concerns about deflation, geopolitics and also the risk of (INAUDIBLE), is there anything that would make us hopeful about the next 12 months?
George Soros: Look, I can see the building stones being placed for solving all the problems. There are six of them, the crises, with the exception of Greece.
And all you need to do is to put it somehow together, because all those con -- they are all interconnected. And you have to put it together and you have to solve one problem, which is the, to my mind, the key is this asylum policy.
So I've been very much engaged in bringing this apart -- about. We are engaged in all over Europe on this issue. This is a major -- it has always been a major issue for my foundations. You know, I was myself a stateless person, a migrant, for 15 years. But the migrants in those days were better treated. So I could study, I could get a job, I could have a travel document. You know, I had a plan to make $100,000 and then retire on the proceeds. And I could outperform that target. All this while I was a displaced person.
So unfortunately -- so now that I am a bit of a senior statesman, my loyalty is for the stateless people.
LACQUA: I'm going to take questions from the floor, so if you do have any questions, please e-mail themsorosdavos2016@gmail.com. And whilst you do, then I already have a couple of questions.
Mr. Soros, just give us a sense of how you were talking about these problems and the refugees also bursting at the seams.
Is there a chance that actually the world economy falls into recession because of everything we've talked about just now?
George Soros: Yes. No, I mean the -- the deflation and the global slowdown makes everything worse. It's a bad background for sectoral changes. So it compounds the difficulties.
But as I say, I see the turnaround afterwards. So I see the end -- the light at the end of the tunnel, I just don't know how to get there.
LACQUA: One question which is coming in, which is greater, the amount of money you made on your deflation trade or the amount of money you gave away in 2015?#p#副标题#e#
George Soros: Unfortunately, I didn't make enough because I give away a billion dollars a year. And that's -- it's a smaller trade.
LACQUA: We have another question.
What do you think of social impact bonds as a way to fund critical human needs?
George Soros: I think it's a -- those are interesting proposals. I haven't been deeply involved in them. But I think it's a -- I've heard about the proposal that was launched here in Davos and I think it's a good initiative.
LACQUA: So we've mentioned a lot of crises, but we didn't talk about the U.S. elections. How worried are you by the popularity of Donald Trump?
George Soros: Well, it's un -- Donald Trump is doing the work of ISIS.
(LAUGHTER)
George Soros: ISIS and before that al Qaeda discovered the Achilles' heel of Western civilization, the fear of death. And when it -- it's -- it interferes with reason and people do things out of fear which is actually harmful.
And that's what -- by fear-mongering, Donald Trump and the others, Cruz and so on, are doing the work of ISIS.
And the -- I actually listened to the debates. And it's a very simple message. I found it difficult to resist it. I was -- you know, it's a -- because it's so elemental.
The only thing that stopped me is the knowledge that it must be wrong to do what your enemies want you to do. They want people to turn against Muslims, to treat them as -- with suspicion and convince the Muslim community that there is no alternative except terrorism.
And so the -- it turns the young Muslim population into a breeding ground for terrorists. And we must resist that, because we are doing the work of ISIS.
But at the same time, I don't think the threat by ISIS should be overestimated because they are very successful in exploiting this fear of death in the Western society.
But they are losing ground on the -- in their -- in Syria, in the caliphate. And they know that their days are numbered, because their -- in Iraq, the Iraqi Army is going to squeeze them out and I think in Syria, they have to govern. And they've turned the local population against them.
So ISIS is also doing this from a very weak position.
So this is the amazing thing in the world today, that it's sort of a competition of weakness.
LACQUA: But what does the fact that Donald Trump is not fading, right, that he -- he is still very popular -- tell us about the angst or fears about voters and -- and what are the polities -- policies that the voters in the U.S. should be focusing on?
George Soros: Well, here, I have to confess to a little bit of bias, so take that into account. I think it all -- it's going to lead to a landslide for Hillary Clinton in the popular vote, not in the electoral vote, because there, paid political announcements will have a big role.
And so the electoral thing will be closer. But the popular vote will be a landslide because she is campaigning for the general elections, whereas the Republicans are fighting for the primary. And the primary is a small minority of extremists.
And so they are all moved -- moving in that direction. And while I don't think that Donald Trump has any chance of being elected, he will -- may have the role of kingmaker, because he will have -- he's lasted long enough, he will get quite a bit of -- quite a few votes.
LACQUA: But you think Hillary Clinton is a done deal...
George Soros: I think I...
LACQUA: -- for -- for the Democrats?
George Soros: Yes. And I do think, actually, she's the one who's most qualified. But that's my bias.
LACQUA: I have another question. How does reflexivity fit into the current deflationary theme?
George Soros: Well, that would -- have to tell you more about the conceptual framework that I use for the analysis. And that's -- I call it the human uncertainty principle. And it's built on two pillars -- fallibility and reflexivity. And the main idea is that natural science has been more successful in bringing the force of -- forces of nature, understanding the forces of nature and bringing them under our control than we have been able to govern ourselves.
So as a result, our ability to destroy our civilization has increased and our ability to govern ourselves hasn't.
And so we are -- we have the capacity to destroy ourselves, with obviously a global (INAUDIBLE) climate changes, manmade, is a typical example or a -- of that. And we haven't got international governance. In fact, it's breaking down.
So that's the situation.
However, I think we are learning more about how markets and societies function, so there is a revolution in the social sciences.
I set up The Institute for New Economic Thinking, INET, in 2009. And I think we have already convinced the world that the prevailing economic doctrine of efficient markets and rational expectations is false.
But we haven't yet produced new insights. But it's now happening. And we are learning a lot. And I am hopeful that we'll learn enough and fast enough that we will learn to bring deflation under control.
And there, I think actually at that turn, we'll see the chairman of INET, who was, you know, before the head of the British equivalent of the SEC and so on. He will -- he wrote a book which I think gives a -- the -- the solution, actually, because he says that we have more that -- the difference between now and 1930s, that we go into the crisis already over indebted.
And therefore, you can't just increase the debt. What you need to do, actually, is to print money.
LACQUA: You can't just print money.
George Soros: What?
LACQUA: You cannot just print money.
George Soros: Well, you can, but it's against -- against the rules, particularly in the European Union. So you have to find a way around it. And you can do it.
LACQUA: I have a question on China. There is a lot of pessimism in China, but will the crisis situation also be an opportunity to push through reforms?
George Soros: China is at a crossroads. Xi Jinping wants to impose party discipline and at the same time he's trying to find a market solution. And the two can't be reconciled. So one or the other has to give.
Either the -- there has to be political reforms, as well as economic reforms, or the transition will fail, the market-based transition.
We have a great interest that it should succeed. So we have to sort of support it as much as one can from the outside.
But it's really up for grabs. And it's one of the big unresolved questions. I hope that the -- actually, there is a lot of resistance inside China to this tight party control. There's a lot of open society people inside the government. And they are putting up a pretty strong resistance.
And I hope they will succeed.
LACQUA: If you have questions, do e-mail them in. We still have just one or two questions. On China, the vice president of China was here in Davos. And he says they are not actively pursuing a policy of devaluating the yuan.
Do you believe him?
George Soros: No, I think that they made a commitment to -- when Xi Jinping was in Washington. He made a commitment that he will bring the depreciation of the currency. But the depreciation against a basket of currencies, which nevertheless involves depreciation against the dollar, because the current -- the renminbi was tied to the dollar. Now, it's a basket.
And if the dollar appreciates, it -- then the renminbi depreciates. And that's still happening.
So...
LACQUA: I have -- I have two final questions.
What do you -- why do you think Poland is copying Hungary in its politics and political choices? And where will this lead to?
George Soros: Poland and that...
LACQUA: Poland...
George Soros: -- Poland...
LACQUA: Poland copying Hungary.
George Soros: Yes, well, Poland is copying Hungary and that's a very unfortunate development because Poland is a big country compared to Hungary. It's been a very successful coun -- country, also. The economy has been one of the strongest in Europe. And the new regime has taken the play book from Orban (ph) and introduced it.
And it really violates the laws of the European Union. And the European Union is -- has responded to it rather vigilantly and is now cracking down.
And (INAUDIBLE) has downgraded, so the zloty has fallen and I think the polish population has woken up that they've made a mistake.
They were voting against the previous government, but there was no loyal opposition. There was only a disloyal opposition.
So they brought the disloyal, anti-European party into power. But Poland -- the polish population is very much committed to Europe and very worried about Russia.
So there is now serious resistance and I hope it will succeed.
LACQUA: One final question.What is the biggest threat to the open society today?
George Soros: Well, the open society always -- is always under threat. Right now, you have this -- the ISIS -- the jihadi extremism, for instance. But open society has always some excesses that it has to combat.
In my generation, it was communism, actually. So every generation has to go through every experience that open society could collapse.
It's a -- how should I say, it's a very advanced process and reason doesn't naturally prevail. And let's say the fear of death now can really undermine the rule of reason. And that's what's happening.
LACQUA: George Soros, thank you so much.
George Soros: Good. Thank you.
索罗斯的经典名言:
1、市场总是错的。
2、重要的不是你的判断是错还是对,而是在你正确的时候要最大限度地发挥出你的力量来!
3、"我生来一贫如洗,但决不能死时仍旧贫困潦倒。”——挂在办公室的墙壁上。
4、如果你经营状况欠佳,那么,第一步你要减少投入,但不要收回资金。当你重新投入的时候,一开始投入数量要小。
5、不知道未来会发生什么并不可怕,可怕的是不知道如果发生什么就该如何应对。
6、要想获得成功,必须要有充足的自由时间。
7、在股票市场上,寻求别人还没有意识到的突变。
8、股市通常是不可信赖的,因而,如果在华尔街地区你跟曾别人赶时髦,那么,你的股票经营注定是十分惨淡的。
9、身在市场,你就得准备忍受痛苦。
10、如果你的投资运行良好,那么,跟着感觉走,并且把你所有的资产投入进去。
11、人们认为我不会出错,这完全是一种误解。我坦率地说,对任何事情,我和其他人犯同样多的错误。不过,我的超人之处在于我能认识自己的错误。这便是成功的秘密。我的洞察力关键是在于,认识到了人类思想内在的错误。
12、我不愿意花很多时间和股票市场的人们在一起,我觉得他们讨厌,和知识分子在一起比和商人在一起感觉要舒服得多。
13、很多年我都拒绝把它(投资)作为我的职业。它是达到目的的手段。我很乐意去接受——事实上,这就是我一辈子的事业。
14、我已经和公司打成一片。它以我为生,我也和它生活在一起,日夜形影不离……它是我的情人。我害怕失去它也担心做失败,并尽量避免失误。这是一种悲惨的生活。
15、我完全投入这一工作,但这确实是非常痛苦的经历。一方面,无论什么时候我在市场中如果作出了错误决策,我得忍受非常巨大的精神折磨。另一方面,我确实不愿意为了成功而把赚钱作为必需的手段。为了找出支配我进行金融决策的规则,我否认我已经成功。
浏览量:5
下载量:0
时间:
张朝阳是搜狐公司董事局主席兼首席执行官,今天读文网小编给大家分享一篇张朝阳的精彩演讲,希望对大家有所帮助。
张朝阳理事认为举办奥运会确实是中国人向世界的再一次证明,所以关键词是证明。至于奥运精神倒不一定对中国人的精神和文明重新认知和崛起有什么帮助,体育精神、竞技精神是人类共同的精神,人类的精神和发展倒不一定从奥运这块得到什么精神,更多是证明人类自己,同时也是北京的名片,对北京一个极好的营销机会,使得北京成为全世界的名城,以后肯定旅游人数大大增加,有很多商业机会,所以是证明和机会。回到发展方面他多说几句,中国的文化精神,技术的发展和市场经济导致经济的发展必然伴随着全世界的关注和流行,老说中国人没信仰,其实中国人也是有信仰的,中国的信仰只不过表现为主旋律和非主旋律。
他还说了中国人的自我牺牲精神、家庭观念和对他人的关注和成就功名的追求。一系列关于儒家从两千多年来的发展中国人的勤奋,一系列关键词和参数描述中国人的精神,这些精神包括兼容并蓄和学习和勤奋,因为这种勤奋和学习导致现在中国人充分吸收西方先进的东西,最后形成一个更具有高效率的文明。
他说的另外一点是民间的慈善拍卖晚会,各种慈善活动或者说朋友之间的互相帮忙等等这些都体现了非主旋律里面民间的中国人精神的体现,希望什么时候主旋律和非主旋律体现中国文化的精神能够合二为一成为中国主流的,不能说信仰,主要还是一种文化精神,希望这种精神合二为一,而这种合二为一体现在中国的文化作品里面,体现在电视剧、电影里面。
谈到搜狐取得奥运赞助商身份,张朝阳认为在很多TOP合作伙伴,搜狐作为赞助商跟其它赞助商是不一样,尽管都是奥运小人跟企业品牌放在一块儿,搜狐不仅出了钱,主要还是一个重大的媒介平台,而且这是一个崛起的被越来越多人认同和依赖的媒介平台,报道奥运以及报道未来两年来巨大的中国人的狂欢,中国崛起的狂欢和向世界的明证。在狂欢的大PARTY,不仅是一年的时间,搜狐作为超媒体不只是花了点儿钱,而且提供了很多服务,服务对整个中国人来讲对世界来讲非常重要,是一个崛起的新媒体。搜狐通过奥运以及我们技术上的革新,确实能够打造未来非常强大的媒体巨头,这是我的想法。
看了“"名人演讲:张朝阳举办奥运会是中国人向世界的再一次证明"”
浏览量:2
下载量:0
时间:
刘国梁是奥运冠军,中国男子乒乓球队主教练,今天读文网小编给大家分享一篇刘国梁的精彩演讲,希望对大家有所帮助。
大家好,其实今天来到这个舞台,对我来说挑战很大。因为我当运动员时获得的冠军是靠自己打出来的,不是靠讲出来的,所以还是有点紧张。我想更多地跟大家分享一下奥运经历,因为我跟别的嘉宾可能不一样的地方就是我有很多的奥运经历。
当运动员时期,我参加过1996年和2000年的奥运会,当教练参加了2004(年奥运会) 、2008(年奥运会) 、2012年奥运会。在1996年参加奥运会的时候,其实我是一个非常危险却也是非常微妙的角色。当时孔令辉是新科的世锦赛冠军,也很年轻,王涛是我们这个球队里最稳定的核心。所以他们两个肯定是参加奥运会,那第三个参加奥运会的人员,会在谁那产生呢?是我和丁松,可能老一点的球迷,熟悉乒乓球的知道,当时丁松在天津的时候,是怪球手,也是一个很传奇的运动员。所以跟他一起竞争,其实我心里没有多少胜算。
但是在当时竞争最激烈的时候,有一次我去朋友家里,一个朋友很热心地给我拿出一张报纸,当时的新闻标题就是“蔡振华语出惊人“,再往下看,我记着有一段儿对我刺激非常大,到现在我还记住。就是《生活时报》上面写着,因为他说去封闭训练,采访了蔡指导。蔡指导说,丁松是一个非常有特点的运动员,他的特点这个世界上所有的外国选手都不适应,所以他对外的成绩应该是中国队最好的。而刘国梁有一些特点,但是发挥很不稳定,打不好的时候对任何选手都会输。如果通过这样的这种言论来看,肯定是报丁松了,刘国梁已经无缘奥运了。
当时对我影响很大,情绪打击也很大,一个是自己没有奥运会的机会,再一个我觉得蔡指导对我的评价让我非常伤心,我当时是发挥不稳定,基本功不够,但是你要加上一句,如果说打好可以战胜世界上任何选手,打不好可以输世界上任何选手,我觉得我是可以接受的。所以那段时间,我连续心理压力很大,输了好多场不该输的比赛,有一次比赛打完之后,蔡指导真的忍无可忍了:”你怎么了,你还打不打球了,怎么会打成这样呢?“我记得当时眼泪都快出来了,我没说话,我从板套里面找,把那张报纸找出来了,我说蔡指导,这是您说的吗?(我)是不是已经没有希望参加奥运会了?
当时我记得蔡指导看了一眼,看完之后就说了两句话,他说第一,这个记者从来没有去过封闭训练;第二,刘国梁,你相信我会说这话吗?转身走了,我这心里“哗”就踏实了。因为我相信蔡指导不会说这话,他是相信我的。但从此以后,这份报纸就天天放在我的板套里,我就拿着这个报纸上面写的东西,不管真的假的,后来证实是假的。但是我觉得对自己来说,也是个激励,是一种力量。所以我就放在那儿,最后还是报的我是第三号,所以作为替补运动员,我去参加了1996年的奥运会,最终获得了男双和男单的双料冠军。
我在想有的时候,可能人受到一些刺激,不是坏事,真的不是坏事。那会儿,我还记得刚到奥运村一出来,一看很多记者。可我一看,哎,怎么没什么人搭理我呀?孔令辉走在后面,记者都围着他。因为他从1995年,天津世乒赛拿完冠军之后,将近一年的时间没输球,当时跟我们同一批的,有一个陪练叫王飞,他跟我很好。我们俩就走了,他就刺激我。他说:”哎,梁哥梁哥?“我说:”怎么了?”“哎,怎么没人搭理你啊,怎么全围着辉哥?”刺激我,后来我就跟他说:“你看吧,比赛以后咱俩还是往前走,后面全跟着。”真的! 1996年奥运会,我拿了两块金牌。在参加新闻发布会的时候,等我们一出来,我就跟王飞说,王飞你看,全来了。这种刺激,要是化解好的话,会成为一种内心让你更强大(的力量),你要证明自己是最好的。
当时中国还没有男子大满贯选手,所以1996年我拿了奥运会的冠军、拿了世界杯的冠军,唯独差一个世锦赛(的冠军)。1999年的世锦赛,那次我状态很差,但是运气很好,最后我拿了冠军,也是我最重要的一天。其实我不是说我怎么拿的冠军,而是拿完冠军之后,国际乒联很认真地很严肃地把我请到了办公室去,说你在8月8号的世锦赛单打比赛之后,兴奋剂的检测尿检里面,“表睾超标“疑似使用兴奋剂,说我们会查,如果说要是(真的),可能就会取消你所有比赛的成绩。我当时脑袋嗡一下就炸了,后来我就打电话给蔡指导,就直接让我从欧洲回国了,回国之后蔡指导到了机场接我,一见蔡指导我就扑到他怀里哭了,就觉得特别委屈,这老天可能就是跟我过不去。
你们不知道,当时北京的各大医院我都去过,训练经常练一半走了,队员教练都不知道(我)干吗,其实我是去医院做检查了,当时我多希望自己身体能有点问题啊!真的,如果能查出问题的话,医院有一个证明就没事了,什么问题都没查出来,天天就想,天天就在痛苦中度过。最痛苦的时候,我经常在国贸桥,自己开车,把音乐开到最大声,听着齐秦的歌,当时的这个《无情的雨无情的你》《悬崖》之类的悲伤的歌。开到最大,放声痛哭,宣泄一段之后,再回到国家队里边,把车停好,眼泪擦干,再跟大家一起训练。
后来国际乒联就说,那这样,我们进行三次飞行检查,如果三次都高,就说明你是身体里面自然形成的。正好他说飞行检查的时候是我们封闭训练时期,运动量非常大,一天三练。最痛苦的是大运动量训练,不能喝水,第一泡尿的时候超标,第二个就不行了,哗就这个很淡了就没事。一喝水就不行了,就是第一泡,所以我为了应对他们,这个飞行检查,每天都要等到晚上十点,确定他们不来了,我才能喝水,才能吃东西。那会儿训练完都不敢洗澡,一洗澡水一冲,待会一刺激,你又想上厕所,每天就憋着。
但是三次来飞行检测的时候,有一次我实在是没忍住,想着前几天刚检测完,应该不会来了,就放开了喝,放开了吃饭,结果下午两点钟来了。最后三次里面,两次高,一次不高,还是没过关。我那半年就是这么迷迷瞪瞪过来的。过来之后,我们到了世乒赛,我还不知道我能不能去,领导教练报不报我,到最后的时候报了我,因为如果说中国队不报我,或者不让我上的话,那就说明中国也是对你有怀疑的,但是如果我要是上场的话,查出兴奋剂有问题,中国队所有的比赛成绩,是要被取消的。可见当时我们球队的领导是非常信任我的。
但其实对我内心来说,这半年里面根本没想球,也更没想训练,就想着什么时候能把这事儿给我解决了,天天就在等待结果。在那次比赛里头,中国队输了,我输了两分,孔令辉输了一分,最后二比三,输给了瑞典队。当时我是最难受的,因为中国队输球,主要输在我身上,我一个人输了两分,而且我之前对瑞典队,从没输过球,大家都给予了厚望。而我又刚刚拿完大满贯,对外界没法儿解释。当我们输完之后,直接去香港参加奥运会预选赛,飞到广州停留一天。当时乒羽中心的主任杨树安,一见蔡指导和我下来就告诉我,国梁的问题解决了,是源自于体内,没事!我当时眼泪“哗“就出来了。自从那次比赛输完之后,我再也找不回以前的状态了,所有的比赛都输,就特别想赢得比赛,想拿一个冠军,但是一直拿不着,越拿不着越着急,后来我在一气之下,在美国剪了个光头,就是“削发明志“,希望自己把所有的东西好的坏的全部剃掉,从头再来,再重新征战这个舞台,再重新在悉尼奥运会上能够证实自己。
运动生涯后期的时候,我就已经开始在琢磨了,琢磨什么呢?我在琢磨2008年奥运会,以我的竞技状态,2000年已经不是巅峰了,还能保持到2008年吗?不能!那怎么办呢?像蔡指导学习,当教练,当一个金牌教练,带领我的队员在自己的国家,在本土让五星红旗升起来,这就成为我转为教练最大的一个动力和目标。因为有这样的动力和目标,所以我毅然决然地2002年退役,结果2003年的时候我接主教练。当然我2003年接完主教练,在2004年我作为教练第一次参加奥运会的时候,奥运会又给我上了一课。
2004年我们男单决赛,王皓对柳承敏,之前的王皓六次全胜。到决赛的时候,他输给了柳承敏,其实作为我来说,我也是当教练的,当时只有一年的时间,王皓那场失利对我来说是当头一棒。我记得特别清楚,就是当柳承敏赢完之后,扑到了金泽洙怀里的时候,王皓低着头过来,当我搂着王皓走出雅典那个球馆的时候,王皓一直在那儿低着头背着包。我说王皓,抬起头,咱赢得起也输得起!从哪儿跌倒,从哪儿爬起来!我当时记着,我一路搂着王皓出来,当时我和王皓身上承受的这个压力。也是从此以后,成为了一种动力,我已经认真总结了,为什么会输。因为(我)对我的队员不够狠,他们的心理素质不过关,你前边六次都赢了,为什么奥运会最关键的一次输了呢,那是因为你背上了包袱,对手觉得肯定是输,所以他搏杀得比较凶。
所以从2005年开始,我们一直到现在取得的辉煌里边,最主要的一点就是我改变了执教的理念,就是把竞争作为最重要的一个衡量杠杆,让竞争成为一种常态。所以2008年奥运会的时候,我们非常顺利,一场没输。团体拿的冠军,单打三个人包揽一二三(名),四面五星红旗(升起),这也是历史上唯一一次在我们的祖国北京,留下了这个传奇的一幕。所以我们都会有一些失利,都会有一些低潮,不管你多强大,包括中国乒乓球队一样,也会有阶段性的低谷。但重要的是,及时总结,知道怎么走出来。
后边的时间,我想说2012年伦敦奥运会,大家看到了张继科以最快的速度获得了大满贯创造了一个纪录。因为我们2012年奥运会的时候是改制了,比赛赛制改了,先打单打,后打团体。所以呢,我已经算到了,如果说输的这个人,思想工作是很难做的,他刚输完这个奥运会,你让他崩溃状态去参加后边的团体赛,谁能做到?年轻的张继科能做到吗?马龙能做到吗?可能不一定做得到,那宁可让曾经有两次第二的王皓来吧,我跟王皓下了一个命令,我说皓,你一定要做好以决赛输给张继科为荣,你必须调整好这样的心态,你王皓才有作用。所以下来,真的在决赛里边,王皓输给了张继科,但是在团体赛当中,他起到了中坚的作用,跟张继科继续配双打,获得了最后的胜利。我觉得是王皓其实很勇敢的,王皓的公心比私心强得多。
除了赛场上之外,我想再讲一点的就是,伦敦奥运会村儿外的故事。我们进村的人,也只有这几个人,村外的教练是谁呢?一个是老吴,王皓,马琳的教练;一个是肖战,张继科的教练,两个教练都紧张,又看不见队员,任何劲儿也使不上。他们和马琳一起斗地主。马琳也不懂事,老当地主,还老赢。因为当时运动员、教练员都很紧张。马琳现在不参赛了,那两个教练,他是有参赛队员在里边,他心一直在关注那个,他们甚至在这会儿的时候,都很敏感。马琳哐哐他就老炸嘛,他的教练其实是吴敬平,最后吴敬平就跟他急了,说你为什么这个老要呀,老吴的意思就是,你斗地主是不是照顾点儿情绪,大家玩玩儿得了,你老炸,给大家炸得心情、情绪都不太好。本来就有点焦虑。马琳说怎么的,我斗个地主,我还得怎样啊?这跟老吴就杠起来了,老吴就急了,就站起来指着马琳,你给我滚。马琳就特委屈,就哭了,出去了。这是后来我知道,他们的经过。其实我们在村里边特别和谐,我把王皓和继科叫到一边,我说你看吧,他们几个在外边,关注你的教练都在紧张,连斗地主,他们都不想输,是不是?都想赢。
之所以讲这个,就是说我们中国乒乓球队,在几十年长盛不衰,这个球队能够培养出这么多奥运冠军,它不是一个人的伟大,而是一个团队的伟大,我们队成功的最重要的因素是大家集体的力量。
看了“"刘国梁:奥运背后是成长"”
浏览量:2
下载量:0
时间:
每界大学新生都存在很多的问题。以下是读文网小编整理了采访大学新生的问题。供参考。
大学生就业采访问题
1.就业率呈下降趋势
2.就业渠道不畅
3.实践与理论缺乏紧密联系
4.就业观亟待改变
浏览量:3
下载量:0
时间:
兜圈子的谈话技巧是一种迂回战术,当直言的正面进攻不能奏效时,不妨退一步,拐个弯,兜个圈子,然后慢慢缩小这个圈子,直至到达圈子的圆心,达到自己的目的。这种谈话术,尤其适用于求人办事之时,而对于以采访为业的记者朋友来说,更有着非同一般的作用。
记者宋清泉在张国荣去世十周年忌时,前往采访毛舜筠。他很想了解这个唯一被张国荣承认追求过的女人内心最真实的感受。但对于这样有些敏感的话题,当然不能直接触及,因为前面已经有很多记者都吃了闭门羹。于是,宋清泉首先抛出一个试探性的问题:“张国荣忌日快到了,十年了,我发现香港街头还有很浓的悼念气氛,你感受到了吗?”试探的结果是她没有抗拒,而是点了点头。见状,宋清泉立马追问:“你最想对还怀念他的歌迷们说什么?”毛舜筠答道:“我想对国荣的歌迷们说:‘阿仔跟他的歌一样永存’!”这时,宋清泉这才抛出最中心的问题:“你最想对离去的他说什么呢?”“阿仔,你虽然已经离开十年了,但在心底里,你永远是我最好最亲的朋友,你并没有走远,就生活在我们当中……”毛舜筠打开心扉,开始述说。接下来的采访进行的很顺利。
宋清泉采用的兜圈子方法是通过试探一步一步往内圈走,一直走到内圈。试探时没有遭到抗拒,就再进一层,慢慢的直达中心。最终,顺利让毛舜筠谈到了她对张国荣想说的心里话。采访公众人物,对于可能触及其敏感的话题,开门见山是见不到“山”的,只有递进式的试探,步步诱“敌”深入,并根据对方反应,适时调整策略,才能达成采访目的。
一次,著名足球评论员黄健翔受命采访荷兰球星古力特。然而,刚一开始交谈,古力特就直截了当地拒绝说:“对不起,我不接受记者的采访。”还没进入话题,门就封死了。然而,黄健翔没有退却,而是微笑着对古力特说:“您误会了,我不是想采访您。我只是想向您祝福,您看我手中这摞信,都是喜欢您的球迷写给您的,这些信内容虽然各不相同,但都表达了一个意思,就是向您祝福。”古力特动容地说:“哦,谢谢,中国球迷真让我感动!”黄健翔不失时机地说:“那么,我能不能代表中国球迷问您几个问题?”古力特爽快地点头道:“当然可以。”至此,采访在不知不觉中就已经开始了。
在古力特拒绝采访的情况下,黄健翔选择了“兜圈子”的技巧,否认自己是采访,而是变换为球迷的提问,绕开了对方不愿触及的话题。转过了山路十八道弯,再回到起点,顺利地达到了自己的目的。别人拒绝采访,是记者经常遭遇的。此时,不妨来个否认,避开对方的敏感话题,将其转化为对方易于接受的话题,兜个圈子,迂回前进,最终达到采访的目的。
1936年,美国著名记者埃德加·斯诺在延安采访毛泽东,他想知道毛泽东的人生经历,但毛泽东顾左右而言他,想回避这个问题。埃德加·斯诺见状,突然说道:“主席先生,我来自美国,在美国听到最多的,就是对你的种种传说和谣言,比如,国外盛传你喜欢战争,你是一个民族主义者,你带的共产党是堕落、愚昧无知的土匪,只知道烧、杀、抢掠,这些都是真的吗?”毛泽东听了,感到很意外,甚至有些惊愕,略一沉思后,他说:“这完全是不可能的。我就给你谈谈我的个人经历吧,相信这些经历,能够澄清和纠正那些传说和谣言……”埃德加·斯诺顺利达到了自己的采访目的,并最终录笔完成了著作《毛泽东自传》。
毛泽东不想说及自己的人生经历,让埃德加·斯诺碰了钉子,但埃德加·斯诺没有放弃,而是立即转移话题,说起国外对毛泽东的负面评价。对于这些,毛泽东自然必须澄清,而要澄清这些,就必须用自己的历史作为根据。埃德加·斯诺兜了个圈子,又回到了原来的问题上来,实在是高明。在采访中,很多人不愿意谈及某些话题,这时,就需要懂得兜个圈子,找到一条最合适的路径,让对方不得不说及。
著名作家二月河“落霞三部曲”火了之后,宣布暂时歇笔,谢绝一切采访。半岛都市报记者王晓菁联系上他后,刚提出采访要求,他说了句“抱歉”就挂了电话。王晓菁没有放弃,她从外围了解到,二月河患有严重的糖尿病,他特别疼爱女儿,健康和女儿是他生活的关键词。弄清这些情况后,王晓菁又拨通了二月河的电话:“您好!一直想去拜访您,又怕您不便,现在终于可以放心地打这个电话了。”二月河不解地问:“现在有什么不同吗?”王晓菁说:“因为您女儿告诉我,您现在的身体状况不错,糖尿病控制地很好,很有希望回到以前那种创作状态中,这让我们这些读者特别欣慰也特别期待。您女儿让我在这个时间段给您打电话,现在您应该刚刚做完健身,正在品茶小憩了吧?听出来您现在心情不错。我想请您出来坐坐,向您讨教几招健身秘诀。您可要不吝赐教哦。”这次,二月河终于答应了采访。
王晓菁第二次电话里,没有提及采访,而是以他女儿朋友的身份说话,谈的都是二月河的健康,就这样,让二月河感受到了温暖,最终接受了采访。记者采访时,直言遭拒,不妨先做足前戏,了解对方的喜好,聊聊对方最为关注的话题,以轻松愉快的谈话,冲淡对方的设防。事实上,只要沟通顺畅,话匣子打开了,何愁兜不到圈子的中心,达不到自己目标呢?
英国著名军事战略家利德尔·哈特说:“在战略上,最漫长的迂回道路,常常又是达到目的的最短途径。”迂回虽然是兜圈子,却是达到目的的最短途径。不管是记者采访别人,还是普通人求人办事,都要善于兜圈子,让别人绕进圈子里,如此,我们也就能很好地达到谈话的目的了。
浏览量:2
下载量:0
时间:
演讲作为一门学问越来越受到人们的重视。一个成功的演讲,固然少不了观点鲜明,逻辑严谨,论理充分,感情真挚。然而,准确的手势对于演讲取得好的效果,也是一个不可忽视的因素。以下为你推荐于丹在演讲中惯用的手势图集,希望对你有帮助!
于丹演讲手势集
于丹演讲手势集
于丹演讲手势集
浏览量:2
下载量:0
时间:
电视现场报道中,主持人要做的是通过“提问”和“倾听”,将新闻事实或观点如实全面地传达给受众,本文对主持人“提问”与“倾听”技巧进行了分析。主持人与采访对象的交谈是一个主题与表现形式整合的过程,提问是为了将事实的真相全面多角度的呈现,倾听是为了得到采访对象的精彩谈话。
在倾听的同时需要思考话语的衔接、贯穿以及如何去结束、切断嘉宾和打进热线听众的话;对倾听到的内容要充分理解分析、去粗取精,留下有价值的信息;在与对方对话的同时,始终考虑谈话的主题,以及如何通过自己的话语使主题清晰;要掌握快速思考的能力,对一些新信息,积极引导发掘,将节目推向高潮。
柴静在《北大屠夫》节目中,听完陆步轩关于尊重知识分子的回答后,进一步提问“你一直在心里还是把自己当做一个知识分子?”“对”陆步轩说,接着他扶了一下眼镜,并且说“说到这儿我很动情……”然后就是目光凝视前方。为什么陆步轩会如此动情,因为柴静与他的对话触动了他心灵深处最柔软的部分。正是柴静学会倾听并给自己留下了思考的空间,才不露痕迹地把主题步步引向深入,自如地驾驭了现场。倾听是交流的基础,也是完成节目意图的基础。在谈话节目中,主持人只有在现场认真地倾听,才能知道嘉宾和观众所表达的是否合乎节目的创作意图,是否能完成节目的传播目的,在偏离主题的时候加以引导。
主持人与采访对象的交谈是一个主题与表现形式整合的过程,提问是为了将事实的真相全面多角度的呈现,倾听是为了得到采访对象的精彩谈话。二者相辅相成、相互融通才能相得益彰。
浏览量:3
下载量:0
时间:
兜圈子的谈话技巧是一种迂回战术,当直言的正面进攻不能奏效时,不妨退一步,拐个弯,兜个圈子,然后慢慢缩小这个圈子,直至到达圈子的圆心,达到自己的目的。这种谈话术,尤其适用于求人办事之时,而对于以采访为业的记者朋友来说,更有着非同一般的作用。
记者宋清泉在张国荣去世十周年忌时,前往采访毛舜筠。他很想了解这个唯一被张国荣承认追求过的女人内心最真实的感受。但对于这样有些敏感的话题,当然不能直接触及,因为前面已经有很多记者都吃了闭门羹。于是,宋清泉首先抛出一个试探性的问题:“张国荣忌日快到了,十年了,我发现香港街头还有很浓的悼念气氛,你感受到了吗?”试探的结果是她没有抗拒,而是点了点头。见状,宋清泉立马追问:“你最想对还怀念他的歌迷们说什么?”毛舜筠答道:“我想对国荣的歌迷们说:‘阿仔跟他的歌一样永存’!”这时,宋清泉这才抛出最中心的问题:“你最想对离去的他说什么呢?”“阿仔,你虽然已经离开十年了,但在心底里,你永远是我最好最亲的朋友,你并没有走远,就生活在我们当中……”毛舜筠打开心扉,开始述说。接下来的采访进行的很顺利。
宋清泉采用的兜圈子方法是通过试探一步一步往内圈走,一直走到内圈。试探时没有遭到抗拒,就再进一层,慢慢的直达中心。最终,顺利让毛舜筠谈到了她对张国荣想说的心里话。采访公众人物,对于可能触及其敏感的话题,开门见山是见不到“山”的,只有递进式的试探,步步诱“敌”深入,并根据对方反应,适时调整策略,才能达成采访目的。
一次,著名足球评论员黄健翔受命采访荷兰球星古力特。然而,刚一开始交谈,古力特就直截了当地拒绝说:“对不起,我不接受记者的采访。”还没进入话题,门就封死了。然而,黄健翔没有退却,而是微笑着对古力特说:“您误会了,我不是想采访您。我只是想向您祝福,您看我手中这摞信,都是喜欢您的球迷写给您的,这些信内容虽然各不相同,但都表达了一个意思,就是向您祝福。”古力特动容地说:“哦,谢谢,中国球迷真让我感动!”黄健翔不失时机地说:“那么,我能不能代表中国球迷问您几个问题?”古力特爽快地点头道:“当然可以。”至此,采访在不知不觉中就已经开始了。
在古力特拒绝采访的情况下,黄健翔选择了“兜圈子”的技巧,否认自己是采访,而是变换为球迷的提问,绕开了对方不愿触及的话题。转过了山路十八道弯,再回到起点,顺利地达到了自己的目的。别人拒绝采访,是记者经常遭遇的。此时,不妨来个否认,避开对方的敏感话题,将其转化为对方易于接受的话题,兜个圈子,迂回前进,最终达到采访的目的。
1936年,美国著名记者埃德加·斯诺在延安采访毛泽东,他想知道毛泽东的人生经历,但毛泽东顾左右而言他,想回避这个问题。埃德加·斯诺见状,突然说道:“主席先生,我来自美国,在美国听到最多的,就是对你的种种传说和谣言,比如,国外盛传你喜欢战争,你是一个民族主义者,你带的共产党是堕落、愚昧无知的土匪,只知道烧、杀、抢掠,这些都是真的吗?”毛泽东听了,感到很意外,甚至有些惊愕,略一沉思后,他说:“这完全是不可能的。我就给你谈谈我的个人经历吧,相信这些经历,能够澄清和纠正那些传说和谣言……”埃德加·斯诺顺利达到了自己的采访目的,并最终录笔完成了著作《毛泽东自传》。
毛泽东不想说及自己的人生经历,让埃德加·斯诺碰了钉子,但埃德加·斯诺没有放弃,而是立即转移话题,说起国外对毛泽东的负面评价。对于这些,毛泽东自然必须澄清,而要澄清这些,就必须用自己的历史作为根据。埃德加·斯诺兜了个圈子,又回到了原来的问题上来,实在是高明。在采访中,很多人不愿意谈及某些话题,这时,就需要懂得兜个圈子,找到一条最合适的路径,让对方不得不说及。
著名作家二月河“落霞三部曲”火了之后,宣布暂时歇笔,谢绝一切采访。半岛都市报记者王晓菁联系上他后,刚提出采访要求,他说了句“抱歉”就挂了电话。王晓菁没有放弃,她从外围了解到,二月河患有严重的糖尿病,他特别疼爱女儿,健康和女儿是他生活的关键词。弄清这些情况后,王晓菁又拨通了二月河的电话:“您好!一直想去拜访您,又怕您不便,现在终于可以放心地打这个电话了。”二月河不解地问:“现在有什么不同吗?”王晓菁说:“因为您女儿告诉我,您现在的身体状况不错,糖尿病控制地很好,很有希望回到以前那种创作状态中,这让我们这些读者特别欣慰也特别期待。您女儿让我在这个时间段给您打电话,现在您应该刚刚做完健身,正在品茶小憩了吧?听出来您现在心情不错。我想请您出来坐坐,向您讨教几招健身秘诀。您可要不吝赐教哦。”这次,二月河终于答应了采访。
王晓菁第二次电话里,没有提及采访,而是以他女儿朋友的身份说话,谈的都是二月河的健康,就这样,让二月河感受到了温暖,最终接受了采访。记者采访时,直言遭拒,不妨先做足前戏,了解对方的喜好,聊聊对方最为关注的话题,以轻松愉快的谈话,冲淡对方的设防。事实上,只要沟通顺畅,话匣子打开了,何愁兜不到圈子的中心,达不到自己目标呢?
英国著名军事战略家利德尔·哈特说:“在战略上,最漫长的迂回道路,常常又是达到目的的最短途径。”迂回虽然是兜圈子,却是达到目的的最短途径。不管是记者采访别人,还是普通人求人办事,都要善于兜圈子,让别人绕进圈子里,如此,我们也就能很好地达到谈话的目的了。
浏览量:3
下载量:0
时间: